arrow_backXD Is The Melody II

Voting Insights — XD Is The Melody II

Key Takeaways info_outline
Most Generous: Becca Setala (avg 3)
Most Selective: Lauren Seebacher (avg 0.86)
Most Aligned: Kendalin (r 0.466)
Most Contrarian: Ricky (r 0.237)
Most Consistent: Ricky (σ 0)
Chattiest Voter: Jeff Bayson (avg 99.3 chars)
Widest Tastes: ChileanIggy (H 4.267)
What this shows: headline patterns of voter behavior in this league.
How to read it: alignment “r” is correlation with final totals (closer to +1 = nearer to consensus).
Why it’s useful: it surfaces taste archetypes—great for storytelling and badge ideas.
How we calculate these (click to expand)
  • Generosity / Selectivity — average points per vote.
  • Alignment — average Pearson r vs. final round totals (0 for unscored tracks).
  • Consistency — σ of per-round avg points given (lower = steadier).
  • Chattiest — average comment length (characters).
  • Widest Tastes — Shannon entropy over points distribution by recipients.
Per-Voter Metrics info_outline
What this shows: a comprehensive statline for every voter.
How to read it: high “Avg Pts/Vote” = generous; low “Consistency σ” = steady; “Alignment r” compares taste to the league outcome; “Taste Entropy” = how evenly they spread points.
Why it’s useful: useful for spotting roles (“steady judge,” “contrarian tastemaker”) and patterns.
file_downloadExport CSV
Voter Rounds Votes Avg Pts/Vote Generosity Z Consistency σ Alignment r Unique Recipients Taste Entropy Comment Rate Avg Comment Len
Lauren Seebacher 13 181 0.86 -0.779 0.174 0.317 22 4.244 0.331 41.9
Adam Rose 13 154 1.01 -0.490 0.064 0.261 22 4.214 0.214 26.5
Alex Romel 13 151 1.03 -0.451 0.136 0.263 21 4.229 0.338 59.6
Jeff Bayson 12 145 0.99 -0.528 0.099 0.253 22 4.220 0.138 99.3
Tarin Gessert 13 145 1.08 -0.355 0.117 0.316 22 4.100 0.248 53.9
Bea Hoffman 13 144 1.08 -0.355 0.401 0.388 22 4.106 0.236 64.6
ChileanIggy 13 130 1.20 -0.123 0.320 0.388 22 4.267 0.062 30.8
Cathy 12 127 1.13 -0.258 0.155 0.272 21 4.168 0.016 60.5
Chaloma 13 118 1.32 0.108 0.355 0.310 21 4.245 0.008 70.0
Tad Gospodarek 10 117 1.03 -0.451 0.044 0.295 21 4.204 0.009 24.0
Charles Collins 11 115 1.15 -0.220 0.308 0.359 22 4.049 0.243 83.1
Liz 11 106 1.25 -0.027 0.419 0.258 21 4.087 0.019 11.5
Amber Klootwyk 9 103 1.05 -0.412 0.128 0.323 21 4.195 0.233 61.0
Ricky 8 96 1.00 -0.509 0.000 0.237 20 4.140 0.000 0.0
Shayne Roh 9 94 1.15 -0.220 0.451 0.302 22 4.192 0.096 25.1
Shannon 7 90 0.93 -0.644 0.083 0.290 21 4.212 0.222 45.4
Roscoe 7 79 1.06 -0.393 0.095 0.334 19 4.053 0.038 43.7
Angela 6 70 1.03 -0.451 0.082 0.284 22 4.183 0.000 0.0
Ariana Schumacher 5 49 1.22 -0.085 0.279 0.363 18 3.963 0.204 65.8
Molly 6 47 1.53 0.513 0.686 0.409 20 3.960 0.021 18.0
Dkubasa 5 46 1.30 0.070 0.396 0.300 16 3.733 0.000 0.0
Kendalin 2 9 2.67 2.711 1.414 0.466 7 2.657 0.000 0.0
Becca Setala 2 8 3.00 3.347 0.000 0.296 7 2.692 0.000 0.0

Tip: click a voter to open their competitor page for deeper context.

Top Reciprocity Pairs info_outline
What this shows: the strongest two-way point exchanges between pairs.
How to read it: “A → B” totals the points A gave B; “B → A” is the reverse.
Why it’s useful: reveals alliances, appreciation loops, or shared taste.
file_downloadExport CSV
Pair A → B B → A Total
Tarin Gessert ↔ Adam Rose 21 19 40
Bea Hoffman ↔ Chaloma 26 11 37
Tarin Gessert ↔ Lauren Seebacher 21 9 30
Liz ↔ Lauren Seebacher 21 7 28
Jeff Bayson ↔ Charles Collins 8 20 28
Chaloma ↔ Jeff Bayson 14 13 27
ChileanIggy ↔ Alex Romel 14 12 26
Bea Hoffman ↔ Jeff Bayson 12 14 26
ChileanIggy ↔ Adam Rose 11 14 25
Adam Rose ↔ Chaloma 11 14 25
Bea Hoffman ↔ Adam Rose 13 10 23
Adam Rose ↔ Jeff Bayson 12 11 23
Alex Romel ↔ Tad Gospodarek 10 13 23
Chaloma ↔ Charles Collins 10 13 23
Cathy ↔ Jeff Bayson 10 13 23
ChileanIggy ↔ Chaloma 10 12 22
ChileanIggy ↔ Jeff Bayson 14 8 22
ChileanIggy ↔ Lauren Seebacher 10 12 22
Tarin Gessert ↔ Cathy 6 16 22
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Adam Rose 14 8 22
Liz ↔ Alex Romel 10 11 21
Tarin Gessert ↔ Alex Romel 11 10 21
Chaloma ↔ Cathy 7 14 21
Tarin Gessert ↔ Charles Collins 5 15 20
Bea Hoffman ↔ Lauren Seebacher 8 12 20
Amber Klootwyk ↔ Alex Romel 10 10 20
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Charles Collins 8 12 20
ChileanIggy ↔ Liz 11 8 19
Liz ↔ Cathy 12 7 19
Tarin Gessert ↔ Jeff Bayson 10 9 19
Tarin Gessert ↔ Bea Hoffman 8 11 19
Bea Hoffman ↔ Alex Romel 7 12 19
Bea Hoffman ↔ Molly 10 9 19
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Alex Romel 9 10 19
Tarin Gessert ↔ Angela 9 9 18
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Jeff Bayson 6 12 18
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Tad Gospodarek 6 12 18
Alex Romel ↔ Shannon 9 9 18
Chaloma ↔ Molly 9 9 18
Cathy ↔ Tad Gospodarek 10 8 18
ChileanIggy ↔ Bea Hoffman 10 7 17
Liz ↔ Tad Gospodarek 10 7 17
Tarin Gessert ↔ Chaloma 8 9 17
Tarin Gessert ↔ Shayne Roh 8 9 17
Tarin Gessert ↔ Amber Klootwyk 6 11 17
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Roscoe 9 8 17
Adam Rose ↔ Tad Gospodarek 9 8 17
Bea Hoffman ↔ Cathy 4 12 16
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Chaloma 10 6 16
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Ricky 8 8 16

Note: self-voting is disallowed; reciprocity covers cross-voting only.

Most Polarizing Rounds info_outline
What this shows: rounds with the most spread between top and bottom tracks.
How to read it: higher σ ⇒ bigger disagreements; click a round to see the breakdown.
Why it’s useful: great for narratives (“The Great Debate Round”) and playlist ideas.
file_downloadExport CSV
RoundDispersion σ (Final Points)
Summer Jams 3.853
Kaboom 3.538
Happy Happy 3.430
Guilty Pleasures 3.296
Anything But English 3.230
Take Me Back 2.994
Fresh Finds 2.876
As Heard On TV 2.837
One and Done 2.828
Powerful Simplicity 2.524
Mix Masters 2.511
Wake Me Up When September Ends 2.509
Floor It 2.481

Method: standard deviation of final points (requires ≥2 tracks).