arrow_backXD Is The Melody IV

Voting Insights — XD Is The Melody IV

Key Takeaways info_outline
Most Generous: ChileanIggy (avg 1.47)
Most Selective: Shannon (avg 0.96)
Most Aligned: Amber Klootwyk (r 0.577)
Most Contrarian: Adam Rose (r 0.256)
Most Consistent: Amber Klootwyk (σ 0)
Chattiest Voter: Jeff Bayson (avg 72.8 chars)
Widest Tastes: Roscoe (H 3.374)
What this shows: headline patterns of voter behavior in this league.
How to read it: alignment “r” is correlation with final totals (closer to +1 = nearer to consensus).
Why it’s useful: it surfaces taste archetypes—great for storytelling and badge ideas.
How we calculate these (click to expand)
  • Generosity / Selectivity — average points per vote.
  • Alignment — average Pearson r vs. final round totals (0 for unscored tracks).
  • Consistency — σ of per-round avg points given (lower = steadier).
  • Chattiest — average comment length (characters).
  • Widest Tastes — Shannon entropy over points distribution by recipients.
Per-Voter Metrics info_outline
What this shows: a comprehensive statline for every voter.
How to read it: high “Avg Pts/Vote” = generous; low “Consistency σ” = steady; “Alignment r” compares taste to the league outcome; “Taste Entropy” = how evenly they spread points.
Why it’s useful: useful for spotting roles (“steady judge,” “contrarian tastemaker”) and patterns.
file_downloadExport CSV
Voter Rounds Votes Avg Pts/Vote Generosity Z Consistency σ Alignment r Unique Recipients Taste Entropy Comment Rate Avg Comment Len
Lauren Seebacher 15 136 0.99 -0.812 0.084 0.377 11 3.228 0.213 52.7
Ariana Schumacher 15 133 1.02 -0.581 0.044 0.339 12 3.350 0.008 20.0
Jeff Bayson 15 126 1.07 -0.196 0.169 0.383 12 3.142 0.325 72.8
Adam Rose 15 124 1.09 -0.042 0.228 0.256 11 3.232 0.290 27.9
Liz 13 107 1.09 -0.042 0.158 0.357 11 3.206 0.056 39.7
Charles Collins 11 93 1.06 -0.273 0.233 0.350 11 3.171 0.194 45.1
Bea Hoffman 12 90 1.20 0.806 0.176 0.417 11 3.256 0.100 54.8
ChileanIggy 14 86 1.47 2.888 0.346 0.537 11 3.189 0.291 51.7
Roscoe 8 68 1.06 -0.273 0.176 0.279 11 3.374 0.147 24.3
Tarin Gessert 5 39 1.15 0.421 0.274 0.367 11 3.234 0.231 23.8
Shannon 3 28 0.96 -1.044 0.058 0.367 11 3.204 0.464 40.2
Michael Snowden 3 25 1.08 -0.119 0.072 0.416 10 3.028 0.000 0.0
Amber Klootwyk 1 9 1.00 -0.735 0.000 0.577 8 2.948 0.000 0.0

Tip: click a voter to open their competitor page for deeper context.

Top Reciprocity Pairs info_outline
What this shows: the strongest two-way point exchanges between pairs.
How to read it: “A → B” totals the points A gave B; “B → A” is the reverse.
Why it’s useful: reveals alliances, appreciation loops, or shared taste.
file_downloadExport CSV
Pair A → B B → A Total
Adam Rose ↔ Jeff Bayson 31 22 53
ChileanIggy ↔ Adam Rose 21 22 43
ChileanIggy ↔ Lauren Seebacher 19 21 40
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Adam Rose 20 19 39
ChileanIggy ↔ Jeff Bayson 17 21 38
Charles Collins ↔ Liz 16 17 33
Liz ↔ Ariana Schumacher 19 14 33
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Ariana Schumacher 18 14 32
Adam Rose ↔ Bea Hoffman 18 14 32
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Jeff Bayson 14 17 31
Jeff Bayson ↔ Bea Hoffman 17 14 31
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Bea Hoffman 13 17 30
ChileanIggy ↔ Ariana Schumacher 14 15 29
Charles Collins ↔ Bea Hoffman 15 14 29
Liz ↔ Jeff Bayson 13 16 29
Charles Collins ↔ Ariana Schumacher 14 14 28
Ariana Schumacher ↔ Bea Hoffman 16 11 27
Ariana Schumacher ↔ Jeff Bayson 17 8 25
Charles Collins ↔ Jeff Bayson 14 10 24
Liz ↔ Adam Rose 15 9 24
Liz ↔ Bea Hoffman 18 6 24
ChileanIggy ↔ Charles Collins 11 12 23
ChileanIggy ↔ Bea Hoffman 11 12 23
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Charles Collins 14 9 23
Charles Collins ↔ Adam Rose 11 12 23
Adam Rose ↔ Ariana Schumacher 12 11 23
Roscoe ↔ Lauren Seebacher 7 14 21
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Liz 13 8 21
Adam Rose ↔ Tarin Gessert 10 11 21
ChileanIggy ↔ Liz 10 10 20
ChileanIggy ↔ Tarin Gessert 14 4 18
Roscoe ↔ Ariana Schumacher 7 10 17
Roscoe ↔ Adam Rose 7 10 17
Ariana Schumacher ↔ Tarin Gessert 9 7 16
Roscoe ↔ Jeff Bayson 7 8 15
Roscoe ↔ Charles Collins 8 6 14
Roscoe ↔ Liz 3 10 13
Roscoe ↔ Bea Hoffman 8 5 13
ChileanIggy ↔ Roscoe 5 5 10
Charles Collins ↔ Michael Snowden 4 6 10
Liz ↔ Tarin Gessert 7 3 10
Jeff Bayson ↔ Tarin Gessert 6 4 10
Bea Hoffman ↔ Tarin Gessert 4 6 10
Ariana Schumacher ↔ Michael Snowden 4 5 9
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Tarin Gessert 4 4 8
Adam Rose ↔ Michael Snowden 4 4 8
ChileanIggy ↔ Shannon 2 5 7
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Shannon 3 4 7
Liz ↔ Shannon 4 3 7
Roscoe ↔ Tarin Gessert 1 5 6

Note: self-voting is disallowed; reciprocity covers cross-voting only.

Most Polarizing Rounds info_outline
What this shows: rounds with the most spread between top and bottom tracks.
How to read it: higher σ ⇒ bigger disagreements; click a round to see the breakdown.
Why it’s useful: great for narratives (“The Great Debate Round”) and playlist ideas.
file_downloadExport CSV
RoundDispersion σ (Final Points)
Make Me Laugh 2.813
Hometown Shoutout 2.503
Montage Magic 2.428
Tear it Up 2.373
Yin and Yang 2.366
Cowboy Carter 2.345
Zombieland 2.307
Anthem for a House Cat 2.160
Theme Songs 2.064
New Music 2.038
Angry Dance 1.970
Get to Work 1.793
Chill the F Out 1.789
Obscurities 1.668
Give her the Grammy! 1.504

Method: standard deviation of final points (requires ≥2 tracks).