arrow_backXD Is The Melody I

Voting Insights — XD Is The Melody I

Key Takeaways info_outline
Most Generous: Liz (avg 1.92)
Most Selective: Lauren Seebacher (avg 0.79)
Most Aligned: Dia Yang (r 0.564)
Most Contrarian: Pax Dorian (r 0.11)
Most Consistent: Ricky (σ 0)
Chattiest Voter: Charles Collins (avg 93.5 chars)
Widest Tastes: Lauren Seebacher (H 4.198)
What this shows: headline patterns of voter behavior in this league.
How to read it: alignment “r” is correlation with final totals (closer to +1 = nearer to consensus).
Why it’s useful: it surfaces taste archetypes—great for storytelling and badge ideas.
How we calculate these (click to expand)
  • Generosity / Selectivity — average points per vote.
  • Alignment — average Pearson r vs. final round totals (0 for unscored tracks).
  • Consistency — σ of per-round avg points given (lower = steadier).
  • Chattiest — average comment length (characters).
  • Widest Tastes — Shannon entropy over points distribution by recipients.
Per-Voter Metrics info_outline
What this shows: a comprehensive statline for every voter.
How to read it: high “Avg Pts/Vote” = generous; low “Consistency σ” = steady; “Alignment r” compares taste to the league outcome; “Taste Entropy” = how evenly they spread points.
Why it’s useful: useful for spotting roles (“steady judge,” “contrarian tastemaker”) and patterns.
Voter Rounds Votes Avg Pts/Vote Generosity Z Consistency σ Alignment r Unique Recipients Taste Entropy Comment Rate Avg Comment Len
Lauren Seebacher 13 179 0.79 -1.399 0.200 0.326 21 4.198 0.447 54.4
Adam Rose 13 141 1.01 -0.654 0.222 0.275 20 3.957 0.191 30.8
Jeff Bayson 13 139 1.02 -0.620 0.145 0.298 20 4.041 0.151 89.9
Alex Romel 13 135 1.05 -0.519 0.299 0.220 21 4.107 0.415 41.3
Cathy 13 133 1.07 -0.451 0.091 0.320 20 4.003 0.015 29.0
Shannon 13 133 1.07 -0.451 0.281 0.374 19 3.998 0.429 64.6
Tarin Gessert 12 128 1.03 -0.587 0.216 0.397 19 3.916 0.391 40.0
Roscoe 12 125 1.04 -0.553 0.108 0.320 20 4.044 0.064 40.8
ChileanIggy 13 122 1.16 -0.146 0.217 0.360 21 4.087 0.049 51.0
Amber Klootwyk 11 114 1.07 -0.451 0.311 0.351 20 4.107 0.307 62.0
Tad Gospodarek 9 92 1.09 -0.383 0.089 0.349 21 4.028 0.000 0.0
Russell Houghtaling 9 88 1.11 -0.316 0.141 0.233 19 4.022 0.023 9.0
Charles Collins 10 85 1.29 0.294 0.364 0.398 20 4.058 0.141 93.5
Chaloma 12 72 1.83 2.123 0.656 0.383 20 3.920 0.000 0.0
Bea Hoffman 6 61 1.18 -0.079 0.454 0.438 18 3.952 0.148 32.0
Becca Setala 9 55 1.78 1.954 0.358 0.278 16 3.481 0.055 35.0
Angela 5 52 1.04 -0.553 0.112 0.525 16 3.732 0.000 0.0
Ricky 3 34 1.00 -0.688 0.000 0.254 17 3.976 0.029 2.0
Liz 4 25 1.92 2.428 1.291 0.461 14 3.454 0.120 52.7
Pax Dorian 2 22 1.09 -0.383 0.141 0.110 15 3.741 0.000 0.0
Dkubasa 2 16 1.50 1.005 0.566 0.250 11 3.257 0.000 0.0
Dia Yang 2 15 1.33 0.430 0.126 0.564 11 3.204 0.067 44.0

Tip: click a voter to open their competitor page for deeper context.

Top Reciprocity Pairs info_outline
What this shows: the strongest two-way point exchanges between pairs.
How to read it: “A → B” totals the points A gave B; “B → A” is the reverse.
Why it’s useful: reveals alliances, appreciation loops, or shared taste.
Pair A → B B → A Total
Alex RomelBecca Setala 28 16 44
Adam RoseTarin Gessert 22 19 41
ShannonAlex Romel 20 12 32
ChalomaAdam Rose 16 13 29
ChalomaCharles Collins 16 11 27
CathyTad Gospodarek 15 12 27
ChalomaJeff Bayson 15 11 26
ShannonTarin Gessert 12 13 25
ShannonRoscoe 12 13 25
Adam RoseJeff Bayson 13 12 25
Adam RoseRoscoe 9 15 24
Lauren SeebacherJeff Bayson 16 8 24
ChileanIggyJeff Bayson 16 7 23
ShannonCathy 9 14 23
RoscoeAmber Klootwyk 7 16 23
CathyJeff Bayson 9 14 23
Lauren SeebacherTarin Gessert 11 11 22
Lauren SeebacherAlex Romel 9 13 22
Adam RoseLauren Seebacher 11 10 21
RoscoeTarin Gessert 10 11 21
ChileanIggyTarin Gessert 14 6 20
ShannonLauren Seebacher 10 10 20
ShannonBecca Setala 7 13 20
Lauren SeebacherCharles Collins 13 7 20
CathyTarin Gessert 6 14 20
Alex RomelAmber Klootwyk 7 13 20
Amber KlootwykCharles Collins 12 8 20
ChileanIggyCharles Collins 8 11 19
Adam RoseAlex Romel 9 10 19
Adam RoseCathy 12 7 19
RoscoeTad Gospodarek 10 9 19
Lauren SeebacherAmber Klootwyk 9 10 19
Jeff BaysonCharles Collins 17 2 19
ChileanIggyRoscoe 12 6 18
ChileanIggyAlex Romel 10 8 18
ChalomaAmber Klootwyk 10 8 18
ChalomaRoscoe 4 14 18
ChalomaCathy 10 8 18
RoscoeLauren Seebacher 9 9 18
Lauren SeebacherRussell Houghtaling 8 10 18
CathyCharles Collins 9 9 18
Tad GospodarekAmber Klootwyk 9 9 18
Charles CollinsTarin Gessert 9 9 18
ChileanIggyAdam Rose 9 8 17
ShannonAmber Klootwyk 7 10 17
ShannonTad Gospodarek 6 11 17
ChalomaBea Hoffman 6 11 17
RoscoeAlex Romel 6 11 17
Lauren SeebacherCathy 8 9 17
ChileanIggyChaloma 8 8 16

Note: self-voting is disallowed; reciprocity covers cross-voting only.

Most Polarizing Rounds info_outline
What this shows: rounds with the most spread between top and bottom tracks.
How to read it: higher σ ⇒ bigger disagreements; click a round to see the breakdown.
Why it’s useful: great for narratives (“The Great Debate Round”) and playlist ideas.

Method: standard deviation of final points (requires ≥2 tracks).