XD Is The Melody X — Voting Insights

Key Takeaways

Most Generous: shakephillips (avg 1.75)

Most Selective: Lauren Seebacher (avg 0.93)

Most Aligned: dtynes6 (r 0.48)

Most Contrarian: Josh Slagle (r 0.128)

Most Consistent: dtynes6 (σ 0)

Chattiest Voter: Jeff Bayson (avg 93.2 chars)

Widest Tastes: Jeff Bayson (H 3.91)

What this shows: headline patterns of voter behavior in this league.
How to read it: alignment “r” is correlation with final totals (closer to +1 = nearer to consensus).
Why it’s useful: it surfaces taste archetypes—great for storytelling and badge ideas.

How we calculate these (click to expand)

Generosity / Selectivity — average points per vote.
Alignment — average Pearson r vs. final round totals (0 for unscored tracks).
Consistency — σ of per-round avg points given (lower = steadier).
Chattiest — average comment length (characters).
Widest Tastes — Shannon entropy over points distribution by recipients.

Per-Voter Metrics

What this shows: a comprehensive statline for every voter.
How to read it: high “Avg Pts/Vote” = generous; low “Consistency σ” = steady; “Alignment r” compares taste to the league outcome; “Taste Entropy” = how evenly they spread points.
Why it’s useful: useful for spotting roles (“steady judge,” “contrarian tastemaker”) and patterns.

Export CSV

Voter	Rounds	Votes	Avg Pts/Vote	Generosity Z	Consistency σ	Alignment r	Unique Recipients	Taste Entropy	Comment Rate	Avg Comment Len
Dennis Jenders	12	181	0.93	-1.079	0.407	0.325	17	3.868	0.580	54.7
Lauren Seebacher	12	180	0.93	-1.079	0.111	0.325	16	3.838	0.372	47.3
Jeff Bayson	12	170	0.99	-0.791	0.161	0.360	17	3.910	0.371	93.2
cmonkman96	12	163	1.03	-0.599	0.170	0.203	16	3.908	0.196	24.2
Peggy Moe	12	159	1.06	-0.455	0.125	0.317	16	3.849	0.277	34.0
Josh Slagle	11	152	1.01	-0.695	0.050	0.128	16	3.889	0.000	0.0
Alex Romel	12	146	1.15	-0.023	0.135	0.295	16	3.817	0.123	48.7
Adam Rose	12	141	1.19	0.169	0.165	0.178	16	3.805	0.177	31.4
Sophie	11	136	1.13	-0.119	0.323	0.342	16	3.869	0.103	20.1
Stacey Gamble	12	134	1.25	0.457	0.301	0.330	17	3.854	0.134	29.8
SlyMc	12	128	1.31	0.746	0.255	0.382	16	3.850	0.125	36.5
Charles Collins	9	121	1.04	-0.551	0.356	0.448	16	3.787	0.438	42.8
ChileanIggy	11	117	1.32	0.794	0.306	0.380	16	3.820	0.265	63.5
Ariana Schumacher	8	114	0.98	-0.839	0.031	0.172	16	3.910	0.053	73.2
Bea Hoffman	9	109	1.16	0.025	0.167	0.373	16	3.899	0.138	28.5
shakephillips	11	88	1.75	2.858	0.324	0.284	16	3.724	0.000	0.0
dtynes6	2	20	1.40	1.178	0.000	0.480	13	3.441	0.050	87.0

Tip: click a voter to open their competitor page for deeper context.

Top Reciprocity Pairs

What this shows: the strongest two-way point exchanges between pairs.
How to read it: “A → B” totals the points A gave B; “B → A” is the reverse.
Why it’s useful: reveals alliances, appreciation loops, or shared taste.

Export CSV

Pair	A → B	B → A	Total
Alex Romel ↔ Lauren Seebacher	28	26	54
Josh Slagle ↔ Peggy Moe	20	22	42
Jeff Bayson ↔ Adam Rose	19	19	38
Stacey Gamble ↔ shakephillips	19	18	37
SlyMc ↔ Dennis Jenders	25	10	35
ChileanIggy ↔ Adam Rose	17	17	34
cmonkman96 ↔ Alex Romel	16	18	34
Dennis Jenders ↔ Sophie	14	20	34
Jeff Bayson ↔ shakephillips	14	19	33
Stacey Gamble ↔ Sophie	18	14	32
SlyMc ↔ Charles Collins	13	17	30
Dennis Jenders ↔ shakephillips	16	14	30
Stacey Gamble ↔ Adam Rose	16	13	29
ChileanIggy ↔ Alex Romel	14	14	28
Josh Slagle ↔ shakephillips	8	20	28
Adam Rose ↔ shakephillips	12	16	28
Josh Slagle ↔ Dennis Jenders	17	10	27
Alex Romel ↔ Ariana Schumacher	12	15	27
Peggy Moe ↔ Dennis Jenders	12	15	27
Jeff Bayson ↔ Bea Hoffman	12	14	26
SlyMc ↔ cmonkman96	13	13	26
SlyMc ↔ Sophie	13	13	26
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Adam Rose	12	14	26
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Sophie	15	11	26
Charles Collins ↔ Sophie	10	16	26
ChileanIggy ↔ Josh Slagle	13	12	25
cmonkman96 ↔ Peggy Moe	17	8	25
Alex Romel ↔ Adam Rose	12	13	25
ChileanIggy ↔ Lauren Seebacher	10	14	24
Josh Slagle ↔ Stacey Gamble	16	8	24
Peggy Moe ↔ Sophie	17	7	24
Adam Rose ↔ Ariana Schumacher	10	14	24
ChileanIggy ↔ Dennis Jenders	11	12	23
Jeff Bayson ↔ Lauren Seebacher	13	10	23
Jeff Bayson ↔ Stacey Gamble	13	10	23
SlyMc ↔ Lauren Seebacher	13	10	23
Alex Romel ↔ Peggy Moe	14	9	23
ChileanIggy ↔ Sophie	14	8	22
SlyMc ↔ Josh Slagle	12	10	22
SlyMc ↔ Peggy Moe	11	11	22
SlyMc ↔ Bea Hoffman	11	11	22
Josh Slagle ↔ Lauren Seebacher	11	11	22
Stacey Gamble ↔ Lauren Seebacher	12	10	22
Peggy Moe ↔ shakephillips	11	11	22
Bea Hoffman ↔ Sophie	11	11	22
ChileanIggy ↔ Jeff Bayson	11	10	21
Jeff Bayson ↔ Dennis Jenders	8	13	21
Jeff Bayson ↔ Alex Romel	13	8	21
Josh Slagle ↔ Charles Collins	12	9	21
cmonkman96 ↔ Ariana Schumacher	6	15	21

Note: self-voting is disallowed; reciprocity covers cross-voting only.

Most Polarizing Rounds

What this shows: rounds with the most spread between top and bottom tracks.
How to read it: higher σ ⇒ bigger disagreements; click a round to see the breakdown.
Why it’s useful: great for narratives (“The Great Debate Round”) and playlist ideas.

Export CSV

Round	Dispersion σ (Final Points)
Caribbean Summer	4.053
Unfathomable	3.648
Mass Appeal	3.616
Cringey Summer	3.533
Final Boss	3.311
Rollercoster of Emotions	3.182
Objectification	2.902
Four bars. Four courses.	2.817
Your Personal Rocky Theme	2.630
Covers Only	2.596
Nature’s Symphony	2.540
Opposites Attract	2.127

Method: standard deviation of final points (requires ≥2 tracks).

Voting Insights — XD Is The Melody X